Category: Rabbi’s Message

The Chevra Kadisha

This issue’s question to Rabbi Gabriel Botnick: At a recent Shabbat service, you spoke about relaunching the Chevra Kadisha at Belsize. What exactly is this and what would it entail to volunteer for it?

The Chevra Kadisha – or Holy Society in Aramaic – is a sacred, if overlooked, component of every Jewish community. The primary role of the group is to prepare bodies of community members for burial. This practice has its origins in pre-Talmudic times and is considered one of the essential requirements for establishing a new Jewish community (along with a school, mikveh, synagogue and cemetery).

Before it became customary to bury our deceased in coffins, we would simply wrap the body in a shroud and carry it upon a bier from the deceased’s home to the cemetery. After a long illness, it was common for the body to emit a noticeable scent, compounded by other, natural, post-mortem odours. In order to ensure one’s last impression was one of dignity, people would gently and respectfully wash the body of the deceased. This is ‘Kavod HaMet’ or showing respect to those who have died and is considered to be an act of ‘Chesed Shel Emet’ or true loving-kindness, as those who engage in the work do so without expectation of compensation or acknowledgment. In fact, it is customary not to reveal the identities of Chevra Kadisha members.

Until recently, Belsize had an active women’s Chevra Kadisha, but after the retirement of its leaders, we began to rely more upon our funeral directors to perform this work, as they have a professionally trained team readily available at all times. Sadly, it’s been much longer since we had an active men’s Chevra Kadisha. While there is nothing wrong with relying on our funeral directors, Cantor Heller and I believe it would be meaningful and appropriate to relaunch our community’s Chevra Kadisha as another option for our members.

I know it can seem daunting to volunteer for such work, so allow me to explain exactly what is involved with being part of a Chevra Kadisha. As not everyone wishes their bodies to undergo such ritual preparations prior to burial, the services of the group are only required somewhere between ten and twenty times per year, approximately half requiring the services of the women’s group and half the men’s. We only need three volunteers per burial, so if we have enough volunteers, you might be asked to donate your time and care just a few times a year.

When preparing a body for burial, it is covered with a sheet, with small areas of the body uncovered only when being washed gently with warm water. Once the body is clean, it is wrapped in fresh shrouds before being placed in the coffin for burial. During the thirty minutes or so that it takes to prepare the body, volunteers refrain from speaking – doing so only if absolutely necessary to perform the
work in which they are engaged.

Of course, this is an oversimplification of the process, but it does give a general idea of what’s involved. For further information about our soon-to-be relaunched Chevra Kadisha groups, please join the online
meeting that Cantor Heller and I will host on 24 March – details are on the back page of Our Congregation. If you then think that you might be interested in volunteering, I invite you to email me or to contact the synagogue office. After this, we will hold a couple of training sessions, in which you’ll learn about the process in more detail. We will then hold a final session during which volunteers will practice
on a mannequin. Once you feel ready, you’ll have an opportunity to participate in your first official
preparation with me and/or Cantor Heller.

I encourage you to keep an open mind and look out for that first informational meeting. Whether you’re retired or just starting out in your career; whether you have many demands on your time or are looking for something to do, taking part in the Chevra Kadisha will not ask too much of you and will add much meaning and purpose to your involvement in the Belsize community.

Sincerely,
Rabbi Botnick

Mixed-faith marriages

A question answered: Rabbi Gabriel Botnick introduces a new format for his regular column

Dear Rabbi,
I recently attended an interfaith wedding which was officiated by a rabbi. I know some rabbis and
synagogues will do this, while others won’t (including Belsize). I’m hoping you can help me understand why this is and what goes into deciding whether or not such ceremonies would be permitted.

Sincerely,
Altarly Confused

Dear AC,
I completely understand why you might be confused about this inconsistency across synagogues and ministers. On the surface, there doesn’t really appear to be any difference between marriage ceremonies where both partners are Jewish and where only one is. But what’s really going on is the understanding of and approach to Jewish laws and customs – a tension which resides in both the philosophical and theological realms.

In Jewish law (Halakhah), a person can only fulfil the performance of Mitzvot (commandments) if they are obligated to perform them in the first place. For instance, as Jews, we are obligated to hear the Shofar blown on Rosh Hashanah. Therefore, only someone who is Jewish can blow Shofar for the community, as that person would be equally obligated to hear the blasts as those in attendance at services. While someone who isn’t Jewish is more than welcome to attend services (and even blow Shofar for themselves at home), we would never expect or invite them to blow Shofar for us at the synagogue.

The same idea applies to a Jewish wedding, which includes a number of blessings that are applicable only to those who are Jewish. So if someone who isn’t Jewish were to recite any of these blessings, it would be no different than them blowing the Shofar at synagogue. Another way to think of this is in the inverse: a Jewish person can go to Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve to enjoy a beautiful, spiritual experience, but they would never attempt to participate in Communion, as that is a rite reserved solely for those who are baptised Christians. Of course, every faith tradition has its own nuances, but the principle of reserved rituals is widely shared.

Where things get a bit more confusing is that there’s only one way to get married in Judaism: through the ceremony with which we’re familiar. But in Christianity, there are actually a variety of marriage rituals depending on the identities of the couple. For instance, in Catholicism, there are three types of weddings: between two baptised Catholics (which includes mass); between a Catholic and another Christian (which can take place in the church, but doesn’t include mass); and between a Catholic and a non-Christian (which can take place in a church or elsewhere and doesn’t include mass). So while Catholicism (and other faiths) offer ways to marry members of their faith to others, Judaism simply doesn’t have a formal
religious framework for interfaith marriage.

And now things get really confusing: if Judaism doesn’t offer a way to marry someone Jewish to someone who isn’t, how is it that we all know of Jews who’ve had interfaith weddings officiated by a rabbi?

This all boils down to how that rabbi views Halakhah and whether or not they consider it to be binding. In Orthodox and Masorti Judaism, rabbis understand Halakhah to be binding and therefore will only act in accordance with the law. Of course, there’s a wide spectrum of how rabbis might understand and interpret the law, but they all adhere to the basic legal principles of our tradition. In Reform and Liberal Judaism however, rabbis do not necessarily consider Halakhah to be binding. This is why such synagogues and rabbis might be okay with offering interfaith weddings – because they don’t feel bound to the letter of the law and might instead prioritise their own personal conscience or communal needs over Halakhah.

Of course, everyone is free to do as they wish – and I understand the desire to include Jewish elements in
interfaith ceremonies – but I worry that doing so could unintentionally treat our tradition as a cultural accessory, rather than as a lived faith.

Although I don’t perform intermarriages – and it’s Belsize policy not to do so as well – there are still a number of ways that we ensure that couples of mixed faiths can feel welcomed by, and included within, our community.

For instance, I still meet with couples to help them talk through what it means to get married and build a family together. I might recommend having a private, civil wedding at a registry office and then having someone who is important to them both conduct an emotionally meaningful and personal ceremony at a later point, (even if just a few hours later. Then, after they’re married, we often call the Jewish partner to the Torah for an Aliyah, after which I offer them and their non-Jewish spouse a blessing as they set out on this exciting new stage of their life’s journey. At Belsize, we recognise and celebrate the diversity of our community and strive to make everyone feel valued and included.

While I realise our approach might not be a perfect solution for everyone, I believe that it allows us to honour both our traditions as well as couples’ wishes.

I should add that many of my colleagues and I have been having conversations for a while now, trying to determine whether or not there are other ways to approach this question. So far, no consensus has been reached, but I believe what we’re currently doing is already a huge improvement on the past.

Most importantly, I want non- Jewish partners to know that even if I can’t perform their wedding, I can still be their rabbi and Belsize can still be their community. I’ll tell you, we have a number of students in our Cheder where one of the parents isn’t Jewish and yet that parent is still an integral part of our
community.

Best wishes,
Rabbi Botnick

The Big Belsize Brolly: Creating space for all Jews

In my Kol Nidrei sermon this year, I spoke about the importance of creating an inclusive community where all Jews can feel safe, regardless of their political differences. And in light of the attack on a synagogue in Manchester on Yom Kippur morning, this message feels more urgent than ever.

Over the past two years, a number of members have asked why I haven’t been more outspoken about the war between Israel and Hamas. Despite the fact that a ceasefire is in place as I write this, the deeper question still remains: how do we maintain community in the face of events that lead us to hold divergent views?

Our community includes people who don’t believe that Israel should exist as a Jewish state, as well as people who unquestioningly support Israeli government actions, but most of us tend to fall somewhere in between. Taking a public stand favouring one perspective risks alienating large portions of our membership. We’ve seen other London synagogues lose members over rabbis making polarising statements. But my reluctance to specify my position isn’t just about numbers – it’s about preserving Belsize Square Synagogue as a safe refuge for Jews of every outlook.

And we desperately need that refuge. A congregant had their summer holiday in Spain spoilt by a tour guide who launched into a tirade, not against Israel, but against Jews in general. There is a retailer in Germany who recently displayed a sign in his shop window saying: ‘JEWS are banned from here!!!! Nothing personal. Not even antisemitism. I just can’t stand you.’ Another congregant was harassed by neighbours, publicly accused of supporting genocide, and had their name and picture distributed around the neighbourhood – not for anything they said about Israel or Gaza, but simply for being Jewish.
It got so bad they had to move out of London. And of course, there’s Manchester. The people who perpetrate these attacks don’t care about our politics – rather their hatred is aimed at all Jews, full stop.

In the 86 years since our Synagogue’s founding, we’ve never needed a safe space for all Jews more desperately. Belsize was founded on precisely this principle. At the outset, we served as a spiritual haven for German Jewish émigrés of all backgrounds. Orthodox Jews gathered with agnostics. Berliners prayed alongside Frankfurters. There were even public forumsdebating whether to establish a Jewish State in Palestine, with the community widely split! Yet despite our differences, that Big Belsize
Umbrella welcomed all Jews seeking shelter.

But maintaining an inclusive community isn’t easy. It requires self-awareness and self-restraint from all of us. Any time we look at someone with whom we disagree and label them as ‘other’, we weaken the foundation on which community is built. In fact, it is an incredibly slippery and treacherous slope when we focus more on our differences than on what we have in common.

In my sermon, I spoke of the diferences between Hillel and Shammai, two first-century BCE sages who disagreed respectfully and modelled how to argue for the sake of understanding Torah, rather than for personal victory. However, while their students initially maintained this civility, when political tensions rose and legal interpretations diverged, the dangers of ‘othering’ took hold. In one instance, during a hotly contested vote, the armed zealots from the School of Shammai trapped and killed over 3,000 followers of Hillel. Our sages say this day is second only to Tisha B’Av in tragedy.

Yet Hillel and Shammai themselves show us a different path. In Pirkei Avot, the Ethics of the
Fathers
, we learn: ‘Any argument made for the sake of Heaven shall endure for all time.’ Our sages offer Hillel and Shammai as the ideal example of such an enduring disagreement. An argument ‘for the sake of Heaven’ means the goal is not to prove the other wrong or to be seen as right, but rather to arrive together at the best understanding of God’s law. Their disagreements endured because they sought consensus regarding Torah law, not dominance over one another.

During my rabbinic training, my mentor Rabbi Ed Feinstein taught me a method for arriving at a deeper understanding of both ideas and opinions: asking ‘why’ not once or twice, but five times.
Pirkei Avot advises: ‘Don’t look at a container, but rather what it contains.’ If we look only at the surface of someone’s opinion, we miss what underlies their belief. By expressing curiosity and asking ‘why’ repeatedly, we can uncover core values.

So ofen in conversations about politics and current events, we focus only on surface policies.When discussing immigration, we might hear ‘No asylum hotels in this community!’ and immediately view someone as cold or unsympathetic. But after exploring what’s behind their beliefs, we might come to learn that what they ultimately care about is creating stable, thriving communities – the very same value that could be fulfilled by helping asylum seekers find stability. When we dig deeper, we often discover we share fundamental principles, even when we initially disagree on policy.

This is what I’m trying to model with the idea of the Big Belsize Brolly. If I rush to take a stance that risks alienating groups, we all lose the ability to have conversations that move beyond divisive policies toward identifying common core values. This approach matters now more than ever – not just regarding
Israel and Gaza, but regarding all the political and social issues that threaten to divide us.

I encourage you not to avoid difficult conversations about Israel and Gaza, immigration or other contentious topics. But approach them respectfully, lovingly. As Pirkei Avot instructs: ‘Give everyone the benefit of the doubt.’ Don’t rush to label them as ‘other’ or vilify them for policies they support without understanding why. See them as no different from you: someone who feels strongly about core principles that you may very likely share.

The events of recent months have shown us how fragile Jewish safety is, even in places we thought secure. I understand that some of you wish I would say or do things differently. But sometimes, in order to achieve a greater goal, we need to set aside certain desires that, although honourable and appealing, might actually prevent us from realising that larger vision.

As rabbi and steward of this community, my commitment is to honour our origins and ensure that Belsize remains a spiritual refuge where all Jews can feel safe, respected and at home, regardless of our many differences. In an increasingly fractured world, preserving spaces where we can disagree without dividing is not just important – it’s essential.

Rabbi Gabriel Botnick

Judging Oneself

Rabbi Gabriel Botnick explains the Jewish approach to prayer

People are often surprised when they ask what my favourite holiday is and I respond ‘Yom Kippur’. I understand their confusion as this might seem like an odd response. Yom Kippur is the one day of the year when we don’t eat, we don’t shower, and we stand in synagogue for hours on end. How could I possibly like this solemn holiday more than Chanukah, Purim or even Passover? I inevitably explain that, for me, Yom Kippur is the most meaningful day of the year.

One of the reasons some people are confused by my answer is that when they hear the word ‘prayer’, they envisage someone having a conversation with God, asking God to intervene in their lives and hoping for a direct response. With that concept of prayer in mind, it’s understandable that people would find it strange that I favour a day focused mainly on prayer. But the Jewish idea of prayer is rather different.

In Hebrew, the word for ‘prayer’ is tefilah and ‘to pray’ is lehitpalel, which is a reflexive verb meaning ‘to judge oneself’. This is why I often describe the siddur as a mirror that we hold up, trying to see our own reflection in the words used to describe God: patient, understanding, loving, etc. When we pray, we are really asking ourselves whether or not we are living in a God-like way: are we embodying the Divine attributes enumerated in the siddur, or are we falling short of our potential?

When I pray, I am not speaking directly with God nor am I attempting to persuade God to answer my requests. Instead, I am meditating on the concepts and values cherished by our tradition: I am searching for ways to live in a more ‘Godly’ way in the world and better realize my potential as a human. This approach to prayer doesn’t require fluency in Hebrew or familiarity with the liturgy. One could simply look at the English translations for inspiration or even just close the book and sit in quiet contemplation. This is why I absolutely love Yom Kippur – and the rest of the High Holydays – as they provide the ideal environment to engage in the deep spiritual work we are all called to do.

As a young man, I was not so different from the average ‘Jew in the pew’. I could sound out the Hebrew of the siddur and was familiar with the melodies of the service, but I definitely did not understand the words I was reading. I would go out on Friday nights and meet up with friends at a cafe on Saturdays. My home was kosher, but I was less stringent when dining out. In other words, I was no different from many other Jews.

But it was through Yom Kippur and the blessings it brought – sitting in quiet contemplation, blocking out the noise of life, refraining from eating, drinking and showering, not worrying about my physical needs or wants and instead focusing on the spiritual aspects of my life – that I was finally able to identify what had been hiding in plain sight for quite a while: my path, my truth. I was able to admit to myself that a future in the rabbinate was probably the right path for me.

So I want to invite you to allow yourself this year to dive deeper than ever into the waters of the High Holydays. If you usually come to synagogue on each day, try staying longer. If you usually come on just one day, try attending another service or two. If you usually just sit there and passively listen to the choir, try praying in your own way.

Prayer can be an intimidating concept, but it doesn’t have to be. It’s actually very easy to engage in it. Prayer doesn’t demand that you follow any strict set of rules or rituals; it simply invites you to have an honest conversation with yourself, with the themes of the liturgy serving as your waypoints.

I look forward to seeing you at Belsize this year for the High Holydays and hope my approach to prayer will help to guide you on your own spiritual journey.

The joy and enjoyment of Shabbat

Rabbi Gabriel Botnick on a route to Shabbat happiness

This past Shabbat, as the temperature was approaching 30 degrees, I sat down to enjoy my first Aperol Spritz of the season. Immediately, I felt as if I were on holiday – enjoying a good book while fending off the heat with a deliciously refreshing drink.

Of course, we are well aware of the Pavlovian connection between the senses and memory. The faintest trace of a perfume can conjure vivid memories of long-past loved ones. Or, as Proust mused in his writing, biting into a madeleine can lead one to recall long-forgotten childhood experiences. Our sages even note that in the Torah’s various descriptions of manna, this heavenly food would remind people of different things based on their life experiences: to the elderly it brought to mind memories of rich, decadent cakes, while to the young it evoked the flavour of sweet cream. All of which is to say, it’s no surprise that a Spritz can help me revisit the sands of Sicily from the comfort of my own sofa.
It’s worth acknowledging that such sensory triggers tend to elicit recollections with particularly strong emotional associations – great joy or anger, profound love or sadness. For me, connecting with my family while on summer holiday is when I am happiest and most content. Without distractions from the outside world or the demands of work, I can allow myself to relax and be fully present with my wife and kids, building memories that help power me through the busy weeks and months ahead. And so, while others might view a cheeky weekend cocktail as a mere refreshment, for me it is a portal to a headspace of happiness.

This might be why, when the rabbis of the Talmud discuss the ways they find joy on Shabbat, they invariably mention their favourite foods. One rabbi finds pleasure through a fish roasted with beetroots and garlic, while another says he prefers snacking on fried whitebait. The idea being, I believe, that by indulging in sensory delights on Shabbat, one is transported in one’s mind to a realm of utter bliss and tranquillity. And it is specifically on Shabbat – a day free of demands, spent however we wish – that this mental holiday is made possible.

Whatever you have planned for this summer – whether a trip to a far-off land, morning swims in the ponds, or simply some time off from your usual routine – I hope it helps you gain a renewed sense of joy, contentment, and vigour. But more importantly, I want to encourage you to identify some sensory experience – a particular drink or snack, the fragrance of a flower or melody of a song – that you’ll be able to revisit once your daily grind resumes. So that later in the year, when you are in desperate need of a quick escape, you can satisfy that need by enjoying an indulgent Shabbat afternoon.

“Make for me a holy space”

There follows an edited version of Rabbi Botnick’s sermon at a special Shabbat service on 1 March to mark the end of our 85th anniversary year:

He started by referring to a meaningful message within the text of that week’s Parsha. The Torah reading had begun a nearly two-month-long narration looking at the description, building and accounting for the works that went into the Mishkan, the Tabernacle that wandered with the Israelites through the wilderness. David later brought it to Jerusalem and Solomon eventually built a more permanent structure, the Temple. The entire narrative had begun with God instructing Moses to tell the Israelites, ‘Make for me a holy space.’

We have all this description of these items, the materials that went into them, and all the various labours that were needed to make them. We spend literally weeks reading about this over and over again. Why? What’s so significant about the building of this Mishkan? Why do we spend more time focusing on this rather than on the story of the Exodus or on the story of giving the Torah and the Ten Commandments?

Rabbi Botnick spoke of Mordecai Kaplan, probably one of the most influential people in 20th-century Judaism, who had started out in the Orthodox world and founded the Young Israel movement of Orthodox synagogues in the USA. He then developed the concept of the Jewish Community Center, where a synagogue could be a gathering place for more than just prayer. It can be a place where you come together to have meals, learn, have wonderful events, and even work out – a place for Jew to live Jewishly with one another. He went on to found Reconstructionist Judaism, a relatively small denomination primarily in the United States, but with ideas that are pervasive throughout the Jewish world.

In his seminal text, ‘Judaism as a Civilization’, Kaplan tried to rid Judaism of its authoritative concept of a distant, abstract God and make it much more about people. He said that’s really what Judaism has always been about anyway – the people. Around the middle of his text, he shares his vision of this new idea of Judaism as a folk religion. He says that the significance of the traditional Jewish religion ‘does not derive from the cognitive element of its God idea but from the conduct in which that idea has found expression.’ This may not be the easiest concept to follow, but what he was saying, in essence, is that our faith is rooted not in the idea of God as such, but in the rites and customs that we’ve practised throughout history in acknowledgment of our God.

This is actually echoed by the continuation of that opening verse of the long Mishkan narrative: ‘Make for me a holy space, and I, God, will dwell amongst you.’ It’s by doing something, by actively building a space together, that God then becomes present in our lives. The holy space isn’t so much holy because it’s where God lives; it’s holy because God lives amongst the people. It’s the people working together, contributing their money, their precious items, their time, and their skills, as they did for the Mishkan, that make the space holy. God isn’t so much present in the Mishkan without us taking the steps to build that Mishkan and to practice our religious observances within it. It doesn’t matter at all what you think God is. What matters is that our individual ideas of God have led us to build a beautiful and open community together. God lives in this space because we make this space holy by coming together.

For 85 years, people, originally German Jewish refugees but now from all over the world and many different backgrounds, have come together to make this a truly holy space. This is a unique, special and precious community. Every synagogue talks about being a warm and inviting community, but most of them aren’t. We don’t say that anywhere in our literature or on the plaques outside, but we truly are. This is a special community, and it’s special because of the efforts of every single one of you, whether it is serving on the board as an honorary officer, sitting on a committee, helping run events, volunteering as a greeter or security, singing in the choir, playing the organ for us, or helping with the children. Each and every one of you has played a role in building this holy space, not just so you have a place to encounter the Divine, but so that others can benefit from that work as well. That is what makes this space so special. That is why we come together to congregate in this space – not so much because of God, but because of how we come together to experience something so much bigger than ourselves, which we might call the Divine. Whatever it is, it truly is special. It is a holy space, and it feels as if the Divine is dwelling amongst us because of each and every one of you.

A hidden presence

Rabbi Gabriel Botnick on the use of words – and a hidden word in the Book of Esther

Have you ever criticized someone not for what they said, but for what they didn’t say? We often see this when someone delivers a less-than-heartfelt apology: ‘I’m sorry you were hurt by what I said.’ Such words do not constitute a true apology. Rather they simply pass off responsibility to the person who was hurt. However, if one were to say, ‘I’m sorry for saying something so hurtful towards you’ – that would indeed be an apology.

In other situations, it might not be as important for someone to be so forthright in their language. For instance, when speaking to a relative after a death, one might consider it insensitive – or even hurtful – to keep reminding them of their loved one’s death. Instead, when speaking with a mourner, we often use more euphemistic language: ‘I’m so sorry for your loss.’ Everyone knows exactly what that ‘loss’ is, so there’s no need to use more vivid or painful language.

The use and intentional exclusion of certain words can be both productive and harmful. Our early rabbis understood this dual nature of language and taught it through the metaphor of fire, which can be both productive – by providing warmth and healthy food – and harmful by threatening total destruction. The rabbis taught that the Torah is written as ‘black fire upon white fire’, that is, the black letters of the Torah and the white spaces in between are both seen as fire. It makes sense that the written words of Torah can be seen in that way, capable of inspiring passion and offering sustenance, while holding the potential to burn those who struggle with its teachings. But the rabbis also teach us that sometimes we need to look deeper into the Torah to understand what is not being said explicitly, but rather what can be understood through critical reading. In these instances, the white fire of the Torah can be even more profound than the black fire.

This philosophy stands out most dramatically in the Book of Esther, which we read at our Purim service and celebration, as the Book of Esther is the only book in the Bible that does not contain the name of God. So, if God’s name isn’t in the Book of Esther, why is this text included in the Bible? Well, drawing on the metaphor of black fire on white fire, the rabbis teach us that God actually is present in the text – just in hidden ways. In fact, the name Esther itself means ‘I will hide.’ Of course, this ‘hiding’ could refer to the fact that Esther hides her Jewish identity from her husband, the king, but the rabbis prefer to see the name Esther as an allusion to a verse in Deuteronomy, in which God says, ‘I will hide my face’ from the Israelites at a later time (Deut. 31:18). The Bible explains that Esther’s real name was Hadassah (Esther 2:7), which may not seem so significant at first. But the rabbis say this name alludes to a verse in Isaiah that says, ‘Hadas (myrtle) will rise up and be to God as a name.’ (Isaiah 55:13). In other words, the name Esther may be a placeholder for the name Hadassah, which in turn is a placeholder for the name of God.

Finally, there is yet another way in which the name of God may be hidden in the text of Esther. There is a tradition to write the Megillah so that the first word of almost every column is ‘HaMelech,’ which means ‘the king.’ On the surface, each use of HaMelech clearly refers to King Achashverosh. But on a deeper, mystical level, each HaMelech might be a hidden reference to God, who is also known by this name.

So, is the name of God really absent from the Book of Esther? Technically, yes. But in reality, I don’t think it is. One could easily read the story of Purim and conclude that God played no role in our victory over the wicked Haman. But the rabbis teach us not to be so quick in making this assumption. And more importantly, the rabbis are actually trying to teach us not to be so quick in assuming that God doesn’t play a role in our lives today. Just because we can’t see or hear God doesn’t mean God isn’t there. Rather, God is hidden in our world, and we are all tasked with figuring out how best to reveal God’s presence. Who knows, you might find God in nature, in our traditions, or even in the words and actions of our everyday heroes.
Chag sameach!

Light in the Darkness

Rabbi Gabriel Botnick encourages us to recognise optimism in the light of the Chanukah candles

According to the Talmud, God created humankind on the sixth day following Rosh Hashanah. As that first autumn progressed, Adam noticed that the days were getting shorter – that there was a decreasing amount of light in the world – and he worried that the world was coming to an end, and so he observed an eight-day period of mourning. But then, shortly after midwinter, he noticed the days began to lengthen once more and that this must simply be the way of the world, so he observed an eightday period of celebration, lighting candles each day to contribute even more light to the world. And thus, Adam laid the foundation for what would eventually become our celebration of Chanukah.

Of course we do not understand this story to be factual, yet it still speaks to a profound truth in life: that light and darkness – joy and pain – ebb and flow independently of our own actions. And just as every night is followed by the dawn of a new day, so too all periods of darkness eventually give way to brighter days.

This truth applies to each of us individually: dark clouds of depression at some point give way to renewed feelings of happiness and hope, and highs of elation in turn are supplanted by struggles and pain. It is therefore paramount – especially when all hope seems lost – to remind ourselves of this cyclical nature of life.

And this truth also applies to us collectively: our people will experience periods of safety and prosperity as well as periods of worry and strife. The very recent past has reminded us far too well of this fact, and so now, more than in a long time, we must remind ourselves that this too will pass.

This year, like last, many of us may have struggled to decide whether to position our Chanukah candles in the window where they could be seen by others (and therefore draw attention to ourselves as Jews) or to place them somewhere more discreet inside our homes. So, I encourage you to consider our sages’ portrayal of Adam that first winter following Creation: do not allow yourself to become overwhelmed by the prospect of darkness, but celebrate this celestial reminder that brighter days are awaiting us. Why not hasten their arrival by contributing as much of our light as possible?

Restoration and Remembrance

Cantor Paul Heller officiated at a moving rededication in Austria

Earlier this year, the Government of Lower Austria and the Institute for Jewish History in Austria invited me to participate in the inauguration of the restored synagogue and old cemetery of St. Pölten, about 40 miles west of Vienna, where my paternal family comes from.

Jews have been part of Lower Austria’s population for over a millennium. In the Middle Ages, they primarily lived in imperial cities where they found legal and economic protection, enabling the rise of a local Jewish bourgeoisie. However, by the late 15th century, most towns were judenfrei due to campaigns of persecution. Only Vienna retained a small Jewish community during the 16th and 17th centuries. In the 18th century, partial toleration policies led to a Jewish return, and by the 19th century, there was renewed immigration, with Jews settling in St. Pölten, the capital of Lower Austria, and its surrounding towns, as well as in Vienna.

In March 1938, Austria was incorporated into Germany. The Anschluss was greeted enthusiastically by the majority of the population. Persecution of the Jewish population commenced soon afterwards and then came 9 November 1938, Kristallnacht (‘Night of Broken Glass’), pogroms that were particularly brutal in Austria. Most of the synagogues in Vienna and elsewhere, including St. Pölten, were destroyed and the cemeteries vandalised. The events of that night were not just an attack on buildings but a devastating blow to a vibrant culture and community that had flourished for centuries.

In the following decades , it became clear that restoration and preservation of Jewish sites in Lower Austria were important to local communities, as well as to the museum sector. A large investment was made by the government of Austria in recognition of the profound tragedy that Kristallnacht and subsequent persecution had inflicted upon the Jewish community.

The restored synagogue and memorial at the destroyed cemetery of St. Pölten reverberate with the history and heritage of my family and others. As we stood together, participating in their inauguration, we felt that the act of restoration was more than a symbolic gesture. It was a testament to resilience, to the endurance of memory, and to the importance of reclaiming heritage. The ceremonies served as a powerful reminder of the importance of honouring history, especially in places where that history had been so violently interrupted. I was struck by the mixed emotions of the participants, mostly descendants, who came together from across the globe – joy at the revival of sacred spaces, tempered by the sombre remembrance of those who were lost. We were joined by local dignitaries, uniting people of diverse backgrounds, to honour the memory of our ancestors who had faced unimaginable hardships, with presentations that still resound in our minds.

The gathering instilled in all of us a sense of responsibility to preserve the lessons of the past. In this way, the synagogue and cemetery are not just relics; they are living memorials that breathe life into our shared history and identity. The work done by the Institute of the History of Jews of Austria (INJOEST) under Dr Martha Keil has brought to light what would have remained in the archives.

Standing together, the air filled with prayer, reminded us that the roots of prayer and the tradition surrounding it are at least as important as the text itself. We reaffirmed our commitment to tolerance and understanding, for it is vital that we should all learn from our history to prevent the repetition of such atrocities. The legacy of those who endured the horrors of the Holocaust must continue to guide us, reminding us of the importance of fighting against hatred and discrimination in all forms. The Central European experience of antisemitism, directly linked to the history of fascist and socialist regimes, is also linked to post-war amnesia and socio-political negligence. So it will not suffice just to arrive at reconciliation and to open up closed narratives about Jews. The institutions set up to implement the restoration, preservation and conservation of locations where the desecrated synagogues and cemeteries once stood, and the cultural authorities responsible for the protection of monuments, can be used to educate future generations with exhibitions, workshops and cultural events. In Austria, under the guidance of INJOEST, we can hope that with God’s will, despite recent worrying political trends, truth and peace will prevail.

The reason and way to connect

Rabbi Gabriel Botnick encourages us to take a more relaxed approach to the High Holyday services

Ever since I was a young child, I have loved going to synagogue on the High Holydays. Not so much for the religious or spiritual experience – I only learned to appreciate this aspect of the holydays well into adulthood. I also didn’t love my parents forcing me into an itchy woollen suit or constraining necktie, but I still loved going to shul on Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. I loved sitting with my family in the balcony, where I had a perfect view not only of the rabbi and cantor, but the choir and organist as well. Best of all, I had a perfect vantage to see which of my friends were sitting where, whose hat and jewellery was the most ostentatious, and who dozed off during the rabbi’s sermon – all sights that brought me much joy.

But despite these decidedly nonreligious aspects of attending High Holyday services, my favourite memories are of standing between my parents, singing beautiful and familiar melodies in an unfamiliar tongue, and just feeling like I was connected to something much bigger than myself – to the hundreds of other Jews in the synagogue, the millions of other Jews around the world, and the myriad generations that came before me who all enjoyed the same experiences.

In short, there are many reasons to come to synagogue on the High Holydays. Some people come for the music while others come for the sermon. Some people come to connect with their friends while others come to disconnect from the demands of life. There’s no one reason to come to shul on the holydays and no reason is better – or more legitimate – than another.

In Judaism, we often speak about the three kinds of relationships we enjoy – with others, with God, and with ourselves. The only reason for coming to synagogue that matters is the one that helps you connect on a deeper level with any or all three of these relationships. But just coming to synagogue isn’t always enough to effectively achieve the connection you seek. You may very well arrive at shul with the best of intentions, but end up feeling lost in the liturgy, turned off by the language, or befuddled by the rituals. But this does not need to be the case.

If you find yourself in services feeling more distant from God, others, or yourself compared to before you walked through the doors, then try mixing things up. Don’t worry about doing the holydays the ‘right way’. Don’t worry if you’re on the wrong page or if you fail to bow at the proper time. Those things don’t matter – they’re only there to help you in your quest to connect. Instead of giving in to feelings of foolishness or inadequacy, try using those moments to empower yourself by finding your own way to connect. Flip through the pages of the machzor, find a passage that resonates with you, and take some time to meditate on ways to embody the themes of that text. Close your eyes and allow yourself to get swept away by the singing of the cantor and choir. You could even come prepared by bringing along a beloved book that might help you achieve clarity of thought.

There’s no one right way to ‘do’ High Holyday services, just as there’s no one right reason to show up in the first place. My only wish for you is that, by joining us at Belsize for the High Holydays this year, you’ll find your own, meaningful way to deepen your connection with the relationships that matter most.
Shanah Tovah!